top of page
Writer's pictureRenee Spencer

Reflecting on NAIDOC Week 2024: Examining the Role of Major Churches in Aboriginal History

PART 1 OF 4


naidoc logo

Last week, Australians celebrated NAIDOC Week, a time dedicated to recognising and honouring the history, culture, and achievements of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. This year's theme, "For Our Elders," underscored the importance of wisdom and guidance in Indigenous communities. In reflecting on this theme, it's crucial to examine the historical relationships between major religious institutions—the Lutheran Church, the Catholic Church, and the Church of England—and Aboriginal Australians. These churches have been both bastions of peace and love and instruments of coercive control.


Churches as Cults: A Complex Legacy

Religious institutions often present themselves as communities of faith, offering peace, love, and spiritual guidance. However, when viewed through the lens of Renee Cult Ranking criteria, elements of these churches' interactions with Aboriginal communities reveal characteristics akin to coercive cults. Renee's criteria highlight key aspects such as authoritarian leadership, exploitation, and thought reform—elements that were, at times, present in these churches' dealings with Aboriginal Australians.


The Lutheran Church


The Lutheran Church is recognised for its advocacy and support for Aboriginal rights, often standing against the exploitation and mistreatment of Aboriginal people. Missionaries like Pastor Carl Strehlow worked to document and respect Aboriginal languages and traditions, making notable efforts to preserve cultural heritage.


Positive Contributions:

  • Education and Healthcare: Establishment of missions such as Hermannsburg and Hope Vale.

  • Cultural Respect: Efforts to document and integrate Aboriginal languages and traditions.

  • Advocacy: Lobbying for better treatment and protection of Aboriginal people.


Controversies:

  • Assimilation Policies: Efforts to convert and assimilate Aboriginal people into European ways of life.

  • Stolen Generations: Participation in the broader system of forced removal of children.

  • Abuse and Neglect: Instances of physical, emotional, and sometimes sexual abuse within institutions.


The Catholic Church


The Catholic Church has had a significant impact on Aboriginal communities, with a legacy that includes both profound contributions and deep controversies. While the Church provided essential services and advocacy, it also played a role in the policies of forced removal and cultural suppression.


Positive Contributions:

  • Education and Healthcare: Establishment of schools and clinics in remote areas.

  • Advocacy and Protection: Efforts by missionaries to protect and advocate for Aboriginal rights.

  • Cultural Exchange: Integration of Aboriginal traditions in some religious practices.


Controversies:

  • Cultural Imposition and Assimilation: Undermining traditional beliefs and practices.

  • The Stolen Generations: Complicity in the forced removal of children.

  • Abuse and Neglect: Widespread accounts of abuse in Catholic-run institutions.


The Church of England


The Church of England, now the Anglican Church of Australia, similarly exhibits a dual legacy of both support and coercion. The Church established missions and provided social services while also participating in controversial practices.


Positive Contributions:

  • Education and Social Services: Establishment of missions, schools, and healthcare services.

  • Advocacy and Protection: Efforts by figures like Bishop Gilbert White to protect Aboriginal people.

  • Cultural Documentation: Some efforts to respect and document Aboriginal cultures.


Controversies:

  • Cultural Imposition: Assimilation policies that sought to Westernise Aboriginal people.

  • The Stolen Generations: Involvement in the removal of children from their families.

  • Abuse and Neglect: Reports of abuse within Church-run institutions.


Coercive Control and Religious Influence


The nuanced history of these churches showcases their dual roles as both supportive institutions and instruments of coercive control. Renee's Cult Ranking criteria illuminate how these religious organisations exhibited traits of authoritarian control, such as:


  • Authoritarian Leadership: Centralised control by church authorities.

  • Exploitation: Associated with forced adoptions, and the marginalisation of Aboriginal voices and perspectives.

  • Thought Reform: Efforts to convert and assimilate Aboriginal people, often at the expense of their cultural identities.


NAIDOC Week 2024


As we reflect on NAIDOC Week 2024 and its celebration of Aboriginal culture and achievements, it's important to critically examine the complex legacies of major religious institutions in Australia. While the Lutheran, Catholic, and Anglican Churches contributed to the wellbeing and protection of Aboriginal communities in various ways, they also imposed significant control and caused lasting harm. Recognising both the positive and negative aspects of these relationships is essential for genuine reconciliation and moving forward with a deeper understanding and respect for Aboriginal cultures and rights. Moreover, it is a practice of truth-telling in Australia, which is a vital process for acknowledging the historical injustices and ongoing impacts of colonisation on Indigenous peoples. It involves sharing and validating the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, fostering a deeper understanding and paving the way for reconciliation and healing.

Comments


bottom of page